Unpaid Breaks

Unpaid Breaks and Expense Reimbursement Lawyer Los Angeles, California


Do you feel your employer doesn’t pay you for your meal or rest breaks or allow you to take them? Or do they unfairly ask you to pay for work-related expenses but don’t reimburse you for these items?

Under California labor law, your employer is responsible to provide you with mandatory meal/rest breaks and pay you for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that are required for you to do your job. At Colby Law Firm, we understand that it can be difficult to understand the intricacies of employment law.

Colby Law Firm will closely examine your case and listen to your concerns to make sure you are provided with your legally required breaks, and that items such as office supplies, vehicle usage, mobile phone charges, equipment and uniforms are properly reimbursed by your employer. If not, we will diligently work to get the money you deserve! When looking for a Los Angeles break and reimbursement lawyer, contact Colby Law Firm.

Contact Us for a Free Case Evaluation.

Receive a Free Case Evaluation

Meal Breaks (Hourly employees)


Meal breaks need not be paid. But employers can pay employees during meal breaks if they wish. No matter what, though, employers must provide hourly employees with an unpaid, uninterrupted, timely, duty-free meal break of at least 30 minutes. Labor Code § 512.

First Meal Break

Employers must “provide” a first meal break to hourly employees of at least 30-minutes duration. Labor Code § 512 (a); California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (11).

Second Meal Break.

Employer must provide a second meal break to employees who work more than 10 hours in a day. Labor Code § 512 (a ); California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (11).


The first meal period must begin no later than the end of the 5th hour of work/start of the 6th hour of work, and the second meal period must begin no later than the end of the 10th hour of work/start of the 11th hour of work.

Accrued vacation payment

Accrued vacation is paid out at termination at the employee’s final rate of pay, not at the rate in effect when the employee accrued the vacation. Labor Code § 227.3; Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co., 31 Cal.3d 777, 782-784 (1982).

Recording Meal Breaks

Employers must keep a record of start and end clock times for each meal period. It is not enough to simply show that a half hour meal break was taken during the day — the timecard must reflect the actual clock times. Labor Code § 1174; California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (7); Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004 (2012).

“On Duty” Meal Breaks

If the employee is required to remain on the employer’s premises or job site, the employee must be paid for the meal break. Bono v. Bradshaw, 32 Cal. App. 4th 968 (1995). An “on-duty” meal break is permitted only when the nature of the work prevents an employee from being relieved of all duty, it is agreed to in writing by the employer and the employee, it is paid, and it can be revoked at any time in writing by the employee. Otherwise, it is an illegal on-duty meal break, triggering one hour of premium pay. California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (11).


Special meal break rules exist for employees employed by ambulance, construction, drilling, logging and mining, residential care, healthcare, motion pictures, broadcast, and wholesale baking companies, and union employees covered by collective bargaining agreements

Rest Breaks (Hourly employees)


Rest breaks must be offered at the rate of 10 “net” minutes for every four ho rs worked, or “major fraction thereof.”​ Anything more than two hours is considered to be a “major fraction” of four hours. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004 (2012).

First Meal Break

Employers must “provide” a first meal break to hourly employees of at least 30-minutes duration. Labor Code § 512 (a); California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (11).

Suitable Facilities

Most employers must provide suitable resting facilities that are available for employees during working hours in an area separate from the toilet rooms. California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (13).


Employees working on a workday of: more than 3.5 hours, up to 6 hours, get one paid 10-minute rest period; more than 6 hours, up to 10 hours, get two paid 10-minute rest-periods; more than 10 hours, up to 14 hours, get three paid 10-minute rest periods; and so forth. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004 (2012).

Relinquishing Control

Employers may not require employees to remain “on-call” during rest periods, even if they don’t actually perform any work. During required rest breaks, employers must provide an uninterrupted break that relieves “their employees of all duties,” and relinquishes “any control over how employees spend their break time.” Relinquishing control means that employees are free to take a brief walk of five minutes out and five minutes back or complete a phone call to arrange for child care. Augustus v. ABM Security Systems, Inc., 2 Cal.5th 257 (2017).

Separately Paying Piece Rate and Hourly Commission Employees.

Employers must ensure that employees with certain compensation plans are paid separately for rest breaks. Employers must compensate piece rate employees for rest and recovery periods and all other periods of “nonproductive time” separately from any piece rate pay. Labor Code § 226.2. Employers must compensate commissioned sales employees separately for rest breaks, even if the the commission plan ensured the employees always received more than the minimum wage for every hour worked. Vaquero v. Stoneledge Furniture, LLC, 9 Cal.App.5th 98 (2017).

Lactation Rest Breaks

Employers must provide a reasonable amount of break time and a private place for employees to express breast milk. Labor Code §§ 1030-1033.

Premium Pay for Meal and Rest Break Violations


Meal Break Violation

When employers fail to provide an employee a meal break, they are required to pay the employee an extra one hour of pay at the employee’s regular hourly rate. California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (11) [“If an employer fails to provide an employee a meal period in accordance with the applicable provisions of this order, the employer shall pay the employee one (1) hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate of compensation for each workday that the meal period is not provided.”].

Frame 1

Rest Break Violation

When employers fail to provide an employee a rest break, they are required to pay the employee an extra one hour of pay at the employee’s regular hourly rate. California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (12). If the employee misses multiple rest breaks or meal periods, they can earn up to one extra hour per workday for their missed rest periods and an additional one hour per workday for their missed meal breaks. Labor Code § 226.7 (c); California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (11), (12).

mdi account cash outline

Pay for Work

If an employer has appropriately provided meal and rest periods, but an employee chooses to work anyway, the employer will have to pay for the time worked, but will not be liable for the “premium pay” hour (which most employers refer to as a meal or rest period “penalty”), unless the employer causes its employees to miss a meal or rest period due to scheduling or other employer needs.

fluent money hand 24 regular

Amount of Premium Pay

On July 15, 2021, The California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC, holding that the “regular rate of compensation” under section 226.7(c) has the same meaning as “regular rate of pay” under section 510(a), such that the calculation of premium pay for a noncompliant meal, rest, or recovery period, like the calculation of overtime pay, must account for not only hourly wages but also other non-discretionary payments for work performed by the employee.

bi person

Triggering other Penalties

It is an open question of law whether or not the one hour of premium pay for meal break violations should be treated as a “wage” instead of a penalty and thus must be accurately reported on wage statements per Labor Code § 226(a), included in the final pay per Labor Code § 203, and subject 10% interest. The California Supreme Court is reviewing the the question in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, 40 Cal.App.5th 444 (2019).

Reimbursement of Necessary Business Expenses


Employers must reimburse employees for all monies that they necessarily expend or lose, directly related to performing their duties or following employer directions. Labor Code § 2802. This includes “all reasonable costs, including, but not limited to, attorney’s fees incurred by the employee enforcing” these rights. Labor Code § 2802(c).


Employees right to reimbursement of business expenses cannot be waived or released; any contract that tries to do so is void. Labor Code § 2804.


Whether or not an expense is reimbursable does not depend on whether the employee made a request for reimbursement. The employer’s obligation to reimburse is triggered once they have actual or constructive knowledge of the employee’s expense. Stuart v. Radioshack Corp., 641 F.Supp.2d 901 (N.D. Cal. 2009).


The IRS sets annual mileage rates to reimburse for business miles driven. The mileage rate is based on the study of vehicle operating cost that is conducted annually for the IRS. It is considered the most reasonable reimbursement rate by California state agencies.

Employers may reimburse employees for mileage at or below the IRS rate as long as the chosen rate covers all actual expenses incurred. This includes not only gas, but also wear and tear, maintenance, and insurance.

Anything beyond the IRS rate may be taxable as wages if the chosen rate exceeds actual expenses. Employers may only use a lower mileage rate than the IRS rate if the lower rate sufficiently reimburses employees for their actual expenses.


If uniforms are required by an employer, the employer must provide and maintain them if the uniform: includes apparel and accessories of a distinctive design or color (even if the style is not specified); and, does not include required apparel or accessories that are generally used by employees working the same job for other employers (e.g., a white nurse’s uniform). California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (9); DLSE Opinion Letters 1994.02.16-1, 1991.02.13.

Uniforms that require minimal maintenance (i.e., are wash and wear) may be maintained by the employee. Otherwise, employers must reimburse the expense. California Code of Regs., tit. 8 § 11010-11170 (9); DLSE Opinion Letters 1994.02.16-1, 1991.02.13.



  • Employers requiring that employees undergo a training course must generally reimburse for the cost of the course. Labor Code § 2802.
  • Some jobs require a specific type of license in order to legally practice in that field, such as real-estate agents, cosmetologists, registered nurses, attorneys and so forth. There is difference between training costs required by law, such as a license required by the state, versus employer-required training.
  • Employers are not required to reimburse employees for the cost of the basic training required to obtain such licenses. But if you require specialized training in addition to the licensing requirements, you will need to reimburse the employee for those expenses. DLSE Opinion Letter No. 1994.11.17; DLSE Enforcement Manual §
  • There is generally no requirement that employers pay for training leading to licensure or the cost of licensure for an employee. If the license is required by the state or locality as a result of public policy, the employee bears the cost of licensing. But if the license is not actually required by statute or ordinance but the employer requires the training and/or licensing simply as a requirement of employment, the employer must reimburse for the cost. DLSE Opinion Letter No. 1994.11.17; DLSE Enforcement Manual §

Mobile Devices & Internet

  • Employees must be reimbursed for work-related calls on personal cell phones, even where they do not incur any extra expenses because of the job. There is no clear-cut formula for what constitutes “reasonable” portion of an unlimited plan. Cochran v. Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., 228 Cal.App.4th 1137 (2014).
  • Employers are required to compensate employees for a portion of personal mobile phone bill, regardless of whether it the employee actually pays an additional amount for work use or not. Herrera v. Zumiez, Inc., 2020 WL 1301057 (9th Cir. March 19, 2020).
  • Internet and cell phone expenses are reimbursable if the cost is a “reasonable reimbursement for the mandatory use of personal devices.” Aguilar v. Zep Inc., 2014 WL 4245988 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2014).

Remote Work


Whether certain expenses must be reimbursed will depend on whether the telework arrangement and/or related expenses are optional (i.e., either because they are not necessary to perform job duties or are available in the office).


Employers that require remote or telework must either provide to the remote employee or reimburse them for all necessary expenses incurred with the remote work. This typically includes: computer/laptop; internet; mobile device, apps or software; printers/scanners; office supplies, such as pens, paper, printer cartridges; ergonomic office furniture.


Internet and phone expenses incurred by remote workers are not reimbursable as “necessary” expenses where:


The telework arrangement was optional;


The employer made physical workspaces available in the corporate office with computers, phones, and other necessary equipment for employees to perform work, and


The employer approved employee schedules splitting time between working from home and in the office. Novak v. Boeing Co., 2011 WL 9160940 (C.D. Cal. July 20, 2011).

Common Wage-and-Hour Mistakes

  • Not paying by the hour, overtime, and providing breaks, and instead paying by salary when the job duties don’t meet the exemption.
  • Not capturing all time worked by allowing hourly employees to work “off the clock,” or illegally “rounding” employee time at the beginning or end of the shift or meal breaks.
  • Not paying an applicable local ordinance minimum wage rate that is higher than the California state rate.
  • Not paying time and a half for all hours over 8 in a day, and/or 40 in a week, and instead only paying weekly overtime.
  • Not providing employees with an uninterrupted 30-minute meal period after the fifth hour of the shift.
  • Not providing a 10-minute rest break for each four-hour work period.
  • Not accounting for commission, bonuses or other payments beyond the hourly rate (such as free meals) in calculating overtime pay.
  • Not relieving employees of all duties, including monitoring of devices, during rest breaks.
  • Not providing meal or rest breaks on time, and instead scheduling them late.
  • Not providing meal breaks because of an “on-duty” or “waiver” agreement in situations that do not apply.
  • Not allowing for meal or rest breaks to be uninterrupted, and instead communicating with employees on break.
  • Not paying employees for time spent working during breaks, even if the premium for failing to provide the break is paid.
  • Not providing separate meal and rest breaks, and instead combining them.
  • Not permitting employees to leave the worksite while on a meal or rest break.
  • Not compensating employees for all employment expenses (such as uniforms, automobile mileage, etc.).
  • Not having an employee policy on meal or rest breaks that addresses entitlement to second breaks.
  • Not paying an extra hour of pay for each missed meal and/or rest break at the correct rate.
  • Not providing “cool down” periods for employees working in hot temperatures.
  • Not providing suitable seating when the job calls for it.
  • Not providing paid sick days per California law and local ordinance.
  • Not permitting employees to use or cash out earned vacation during employment or when furloughed for more than a pay period.
  • Not paying earned wages in a timely manner.
  • Not providing all required information on pay stubs, especially the amount of time worked at each hourly rate during the pay period.
  • Not paying all earned wages, including earned vacation, within 24 hours of termination.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does My Employer Have to Pay for My Internet if I Work Remotely?

Do you question who is responsible for paying your Internet bill if you have been working remotely? If your employer has mandated that you work remotely then they are required to pay your Internet as well as other necessary home office expenses. This will normally be a reasonable percentage of the your phone, internet, utility bills, and office supplies if you purchased those supply items specifically for working remotely.

However, if you are working remotely by choice then your employer is not required to reimburse you for any home office expenses. The test for reimbursement is whether you have the option to work from home.

If your employer has made working remotely mandatory and is not reimbursing you for your expenses in accordance with California Labor Code, then you should contact Colby Law Firm for a free and confidential consultation. We can review the information with you and help you determine your best course of action.

Having a law firm like Colby Law involved is your best course of action. Aaron Colby spent 15 years representing employers. He started Colby Law Firm to represent employees. He has the advantage in knowing how the opposition works and brings that knowledge to the playing field. He is in your corner. Contact Colby Law Firm for a free and confidential evaluation.

Can My Employer Limit My travel time/Time off on Unpaid Breaks?

In California, the Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders require that employers must authorize and permit nonexempt employees to take a rest period that must be taken in the middle of each work period. The rest period is based on the total hours worked daily and must be at the minimum rate of a net ten consecutive minutes for each four hour work period and cannot be limited.

Do I Have to Take an Unpaid Meal Break?

In California, an employer cannot ask you to work for more than five hours without providing you with an unpaid, off-duty meal break. The meal break must be at least 30 minutes. The first meal period must be provided no later than the end of the employee’s fifth hour of work.

However, there are some caveats to this.

One example is that an employer and employee can agree mutually that the meal break will be waived, but only if the employee’s shift is six hours or less.There must be mutual consent of both the employer and employee.

The employer would be in violation of the California Labor Code if they required you to work during your meal break or through it and would owe you compensation and possibly even premium or overtime pay. If this has been happening to you then you should contact Colby Law Firm for a free and confidential consultation. We can review the information with you and help you determine your best course of action. Having Colby Law Firm on your side is your best course of action.

Aaron Colby started Colby Law Firm to represent employees after spending 15 years representing employers. This has given him the unique advantage in knowing how the opposition works. He brings that knowledge to the playing field. He is in your corner. Contact Colby Law Firm for a free and confidential evaluation.


What Our Clients Say

Manny Millanponce
September 20, 2022.
So far I’m really happy with their help and consideration to help people who needs it.
Liat Frydman
March 29, 2022.
Colby Law Firm is one of the best in the business. Aaron and his staff are extremely professional, very knowledgeable kind and supportive. My experience with Colby Law Firm from the first phone call to our last text communication was superb. The end results.... they fought for me and won! I will definitely recommend Colby Law Firm to all my friends and colleagues. Liat Frydman
Joella Still
November 11, 2021.
It’s truly been a pleasure working with Aaron and the women on his team. I will definitely be referring people to them simply because they not only handled this matter professionally, but also empathetically during a really hard time for me. Dealing with wrongful termination and discrimination and especially during a global pandemic, it was really important to find an employment attorney who could understand the situation, the subtleties, nuances, etc. The case was resolved relatively quickly and I felt that they really put in the time to end up with a favorable outcome. If you choose them, you’re really in great hands.
Sajaad Shah
October 16, 2021.
Colby Law Firm got me the results I wanted, quickly. They managed my expectations properly and exceeded them in the end. They are the best employment attorneys I know, and I strongly recommend them for anyone who has questions about harassment, discrimination or wrongful termination.
Roberto Gutierrez
August 24, 2021.
Aaron and his team did an amazing job representing me. They worked really hard for me and got me a larger settlement than I had expected. They were professional, caring, and very responsive. They kept me in the loop on what was happening and if I needed help or had a question, they were very quick to respond.
Ashley Chejade-Bloom
June 7, 2021.
Aaron Colby is the best employment attorney, who will get you the results you want, every time - he is a person you want on your team. He is extremely responsive and truly cares about the businesses (and founders) he represents. I strongly recommend Colby Law Firm to anyone who has questions about harassment, discrimination or wrongful termination.
Aaron Baker
June 5, 2021.
The Colby Law Firm are the best employment attorneys. They’re a great firm for anyone who has questions about harassment, discrimination or wrongful termination. Their candid and direct approach to educating their clients sets them apart from other firms.
Jeffrey Greenblatt
June 5, 2021.
Colby Law Firm is simply remarkable. Their employment attorneys are efficient and effective, and you always know you have the sharper advocate on your side in all employment law issues (such as discrimination, harassment, unpaid wages, wrongful termination, etc). Highly recommend this law firm for anyone who needs a candid assessment with any employer/employee issues they face.

Why Choose

Colby Law Firm

colby 1

Aaron Colby is a California employment lawyer who knows how to resolve disputes. After 15 years representing companies, he started Colby Law Firm to represent employees. Aaron’s perspective and experience from being “on the other side” gives him an edge. Aaron brings his practical, focused, and relentless approach to helping employees protect their rights.

Learn More >

Aaron Colby
Lead Attorney and Founder Colby Law